Inherent Disagreements in Human Textual Inferences

نویسندگان
چکیده

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

The Excitement Open Platform for Textual Inferences

This paper presents the Excitement Open Platform (EOP), a generic architecture and a comprehensive implementation for textual inference in multiple languages. The platform includes state-of-art algorithms, a large number of knowledge resources, and facilities for experimenting and testing innovative approaches. The EOP is distributed as an open source software.

متن کامل

A Probabilistic Lexical Model for Ranking Textual Inferences

Identifying textual inferences, where the meaning of one text follows from another, is a general underlying task within many natural language applications. Commonly, it is approached either by generative syntactic-based methods or by “lightweight” heuristic lexical models. We suggest a model which is confined to simple lexical information, but is formulated as a principled generative probabilis...

متن کامل

Rational disagreements in phylogenetics.

This paper addresses the general problem of how to rationally choose an algorithm for phylogenetic inference. Specifically, the controversy between maximum likelihood (ML) and maximum parsimony (MP) perspectives is reframed within the philosophical issue of theory choice. A Kuhnian approach in which rationality is bounded and value-laden is offered and construed through the notion of a Style of...

متن کامل

Analyzing Disagreements

We address the problem of distinguishing between two sources of disagreement in annotations: genuine subjectivity and slip of attention. The latter is especially likely when the classification task has a default class, as in tasks where annotators need to find instances of the phenomenon of interest, such as in a metaphor detection task discussed here. We apply and extend a data analysis techni...

متن کامل

On the inherent competition between valid and spurious inductive inferences in Boolean data

Inductive inference is the process of extracting general rules from specific observations. This problem also arises in the analysis of biological networks, such as genetic regulatory networks, where the interactions are complex and the observations are incomplete. A typical task in these problems is to extract general interaction rules as combinations of Boolean covariates, that explain a measu...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics

سال: 2019

ISSN: 2307-387X

DOI: 10.1162/tacl_a_00293